Serious Big Bores Beyond The 44 Magnum The Daily Caller
The 480 Ruger is, essentially, a shortened 475 Linebaugh The first loads offered to the public did not show the true potential of the cartridge, featuring relatively lightforcaliber bullets at moderate velocities It was also overshadowed by the aggressive marketing of the 500 S&W Magnum and later the 460 S&W Magnum I have been looking at all 3 of these calibers in the 4 to 6 inch revolver I am not sure wich one to get I keep reading the specs and it seems like the 454 has more punch than the 480 and hands down the 500 has more than the other two I
480 ruger vs 500 s&w
480 ruger vs 500 s&w- The 475 caliber 480 Ruger was introduced in 01 as a joint development by Hornady and Ruger for the Ruger Super Redhawk doubleaction revolver and was Ruger's first brandname cartridge The original 500 S&W Magnum loads from CorBon included a 275grain Barnes solidcopper XPB hollowpoint with 1,662 fps muzzle velocity and 1,685 ftThe 460 kicks appreciably harder than the 454 Casull or 480 Ruger, which are for hunting the same CXP2 and CXP3 game animals The 460 uses a straight, rimmed case with a 0478" outside diameter It is 180" long and the rim diameter is 05" The 500 S&W Magnum The 500 Magnum was designed by CorBon specifically for the S&W Xframe
500 S W Levergun Shooters Forum
Registered Joined 168 Posts #6 (Edited) SnWnMe said The 454 is relatively feeble compared to the 500 S&W If you want the ultimate in 45 caliber flexibility then wait a few months for the arrival of the 460 S&W Magnum It's a supersized 454 18" long case 0gr bullets go well over 00 fps The difference in weight and size between the 454 and the S&W mags in the BFR is substantial The 454 BFR is basically a Ruger Super Blackhawk clone, a bit larger, whereas the 4570, 460 & 500 are stretched frame versions, a pound and a half heavier than an SBH, and a few inches longer for the same bbl length Joined 10,747 Posts #2 Either the Ruger Alaskan 454 Casull or the 500 MAG S&W 4 inch would be great for bear defence I just sold my Ruger Super Redhawk in 454 Casull with a 2 1/2 inch barrel, that I took to Alaska for bear defence I use to shoot it once in a while just to see how the sound was without ear plugs
Joined 16,157 Posts #4 first off, comparing the 500 S&W to the 460 S&W, looking at the ballistics, the 460 generates much higher velocity and muzzle energy than the 500 and yes it has the ability to use lighter recoiling rounds than the 500 does Posts 7 Thanks, I ordered the BFR in 500jrh, I thought about the 454, 475/480, 500s&w & the 460 s&w I guess i'll start with the 500JRH and go back down in caliber I thought real hard on 475/480, because I had a 480 once, and really liked it , 1001 AM #6 ole 5 hole group View Profile 480 ruger S&W s n frame revolver revolvers 1945 to present Jump to Latest Follow 1 7 of 7 Posts S&W Model 500 (2nd one) S&W Model 194 Blue Smith & Wesson SD9 VE Sig Sauer Sp 22 S&W 272 Nickel S&W 292 Nickel Reactions delcrossv and
480 ruger vs 500 s&wのギャラリー
各画像をクリックすると、ダウンロードまたは拡大表示できます
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ||
![]() | ||
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
「480 ruger vs 500 s&w」の画像ギャラリー、詳細は各画像をクリックしてください。
![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |
The occasional exception has been a S&W 625 in 45 ACP The 357 magnum can be competitive but doesn't seem to win even with 158 grain bullets To your point, there certainly is a point of diminishing returns by going with a bigger caliber I've seen a 500 S&W used a few times, mostly as a novelty, with limited success The 460 S&W offers zero ballistic gain over the 454 Casull with 300 grain bullets Both list max loads for both at 1,650 FPS With the 240 grain bullets, the 460 clocks in at 2,000 FPS, while the 454 Casull is only 150 FPS slower at 1,850 FPS
Incoming Term: 480 ruger vs 500 s&w,
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿